Carta Pdta República 15 12 2016 by Coexch AG

Co Exch v Jones, 448 2d 655, 658–59 , and “he proximate cause of an event is that act or omission which, in 9 of 9

Jordan, 1 Younge Co 303; Le Neve v Le Neve, 2 Wh Tud Lead Loosemore, 9 Hare, 449 ) These cases hold that a purchaser who does not call

coexch99con 5-9 Supplemental schedule *: Schedule of Assets ROUSE CO EXCH CVT PFD SER B 20,000 917,500 UNION PAC CAP TR TERM INCOME 77,500

coexch99com Jordan, 1 Younge Co 303; Le Neve v Le Neve, 2 Wh Tud Lead Loosemore, 9 Hare, 449 ) These cases hold that a purchaser who does not call